|
|
||
|
Fair
trial, is not as much a prisoner’s defence as that of the prosecutor
and the court. The court that
sentenced Saddam lacked legitimacy
on all counts. The US, therefore, is guilty of first-degree murder,
says – HemRaj Singh So,
the Americans’ monster has been buried for good,
and his monstrosity has been brought to a lust end. Now, the
Americans can wrap themselves up in the cozy blanket of Saddam’s
execution and live happily ever after. That’s how they wanted it to
be, but, sadly, it’s not going to be that way. The US Saddam’s
execution is another feather in the blood-red American cap. This might
not make Bush perspire, but would certainly make things uncomfortable
for the US. Saddam’s execution has ensured that the future of the
world’s most powerful nation is deep crimson. The dictator’s
execution was entirely illegal and was in brazen contravention of the
international law. The right to punish the dictator, if at all, was the
prerogative of the Iraqis, and the Iraqis alone, no other authority
could legally punish the fellow. And if he was to be punished by an
international court, it was to be done following the procedure
established by the international law. In this case, it was a sham
procedure followed by an illegitimate court, whose judges were
arbitrarily removed to suit the fancy No
matter how grave the dictator’s crimes, he deserved a fair trial. A
fair trial is not actually in the interest of the one tried but the one
who tried because if the trial is not fair, the legitimacy of the trial
itself is eroded, which makes the tried a martyr and the court a
monster. Fair trial, is therefore, not as much a prisoner’s defence as
that of the prosecutor and the court. The court that sentenced Saddam
lacked legitimacy on all counts. The US, therefore, is guilty of
first-degree murder. |
||